The
recent passage in Pennsylvania
of an equine activity statute
has once again opened a dialogue
about equine activity statutes
and their benefits.
Following the passage of
Pennsylvania’s statute, only
five states, Alaska, California,
Maryland, Nevada and New York,
do not have equine activity
statutes.
Do equine activity
statutes offer real protection
for horsepeople?
If so, what protection do
they provide, and are there any
traps for the unwary?
What
Is an Equine Activity Statute?
An
equine activity statute is a law
designed to limit liability for
injuries and deaths connected
with horse-related activities.
The principle of equine
activity statutes is a
long-standing legal doctrine,
“assumption of the risk.” A
person assumes the risk of
participating in an activity if
they have full knowledge of the
risks involved and decide to
participate anyway. Assumption
of the risk is often a
successful legal defense in
horse accident cases, even in
states without equine activity
statutes.
How
Does an Equine Activity Statute
Benefit Me?
Equine
activity statutes have two key
benefits.
First, they discourage
people from suing. Plaintiffs’
attorneys often work on
contingency (they get paid only
if their client wins) and
therefore, they prefer to take
on cases they believe they can
win. If an equine activity
statute means the case will be
harder to win, plaintiffs’
attorneys will be less likely to
take the case. Potential
plaintiffs will therefore have a
more difficult time finding an
attorney to represent them,
resulting in fewer lawsuits
filed.
If fewer attorneys are
interested in taking a case, the
potential plaintiff will also
likely pay more for legal
representation, making them less
likely to file a lawsuit.
By
bolstering the available legal
defenses, equine activity
statutes may also result in
earlier settlements and lower
settlement amounts. Equine
activity statutes can also help
end a lawsuit earlier, thereby
reducing defense costs.
If a lawsuit is dismissed
at the summary judgment phase,
the parties can avoid preparing
for and going to trial,
typically the most expensive
part of a lawsuit.
Equine
activity statutes also have an
ancillary benefit.
Lower defense costs,
fewer lawsuits and less
expensive settlements mean less
risk for insurance companies.
Lower risk means that more
insurance companies are willing
to write coverage, and more
competition equals lower rates
for insureds.
What
are the Disadvantages of Equine
Activity Statutes?
First
and foremost, many people have
the misconception that an equine
activity statute gives them
immunity from liability.
They may believe that
because their state has an
equine activity statute, they do
not need a liability release or
even insurance.
Those beliefs are simply
false.
Even
in a state that has an equine
activity statute, you can be
liable for negligence and
willful misconduct. Most equine
activity statutes are very
specific about this exclusion.
For example,
Pennsylvania’s equine activity
statute states,
“Nothing…shall bar or limit
the liability of an equine
activity sponsor, equine
professional or any other
participant if [they were]
grossly negligent or committed
an act or omission which
constitutes willful or reckless
disregard for the safety of the
participant and which caused the
injury or death or intentionally
injured the participant.”
Equine
activity statutes also
frequently require specific
signage to be posted at the
equine facility and/or specific
language to be included in
contracts and liability
releases.
If you live in a state
with such specific requirements
and you don’t follow the
requirements, the equine
activity statute may not offer
any protection for you.
For example,
Pennsylvania’s equine activity
statute requires the following
notice to be included in all
documents relating to horse
activities (and to be posted on
the premises):
Warning:
Under Pennsylvania law an equine
professional and equine activity
sponsor is not liable for an
injury to or death of a
participant in equine activities
resulting from the inherent
risks of equine activities.
Equine
activity statutes provide
protection only for defined
groups, and who belongs to those
defined groups varies from state
to state.
For example, Ohio’s
equine activity statute
specifically includes
veterinarians and equine
reproductive technicians as
“equine professionals,” but
Oregon’s equine activity
statute does not.
The
definitions of “equine” and
“equine activity” also vary
from state to state.
Ohio’s equine activity
statute includes zebras and
alpacas as “equines,” while
Oregon’s equine activity
statute does not.
“Equine activity”
specifically includes shoeing a
horse in Ohio, but not in
Oregon.
The
Bottom Line
If
you live in a state that has an
equine activity statute:
Don’t assume your
state’s equine activity
statute covers you and what you
are doing.
Make sure you read and
understand the full text of the
statute.
If you aren’t sure, ask
an equine attorney practicing in
your state.
Check to see if your
state’s equine activity
statute requires posted warning
signs (and if it does, put them
up).
Don’t hope that someone
else’s liability release form
will protect you. Have an equine
attorney review your contracts,
releases, show entry forms and
other horse-related documents to
make sure that they include any
required language (and will
otherwise protect you).
Make sure that your
existing insurance covers all of
your horse related activities
and that the limits of your
coverage are high enough to
provide adequate protection for
you.
Familiarize yourself with
your policy terms, especially
the exclusions and the claims
process.
Resources:
Warning
signs:
www.countrysupply.com,
www.kyhorse.com,
www.valleyvet.com
Text
of equine activity statutes:
http://utopia.utexas.edu/explore/equine/equine/equ_menu.htm